Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,263,285 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.881. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.173% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 172.7 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 7.1%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $58,835, a difference of 5.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $108,471, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,213 compared to $46,938, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $41,183, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,729, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.65%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 2.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.54%).