Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Bahamians

Good
Tragic
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,832,046 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.817. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.142% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 141.6 Bahamians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Bahamian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $75,395, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $82,631, a difference of 27.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $81,369, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $45,743, a difference of 14.6%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,125, a difference of 14.9%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $39,735, a difference of 20.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
20.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 48.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 10.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
17.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.0%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 30.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
40.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.6%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Tragic
5.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.080%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileBahamian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%