Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Fijian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Fijians

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Fijian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,572,269 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.952. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.081% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 2,081.4 Fijians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Fijian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $36,690, a difference of 26.0%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $45,607, a difference of 22.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $79,956, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,132, a difference of 4.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $56,768, a difference of 9.8%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$36,690
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$87,387
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$74,205
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$40,193
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$45,607
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$35,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$50,132
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$79,956
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$85,187
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$56,768
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
22.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Good
10.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.9%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Fair
46.1%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.36
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Fair
46.3%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Fair
32.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 86.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 79.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.5%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
96.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
94.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
94.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
91.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
88.2%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
86.0%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
81.6%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
57.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
51.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
28.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
10.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Fijian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileFijian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%