Immigrants from Chile vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 189,185,696 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.075% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 74.7 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 10.0%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $110,635, a difference of 4.7%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $58,588, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $40,491, a difference of 0.34%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $51,678, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $90,446, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 24.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.98%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), currently married (46.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.71%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 38.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 0.28%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%).