Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,255,306 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.929. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $55,582, a difference of 20.3%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $65,406, a difference of 16.9%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $122,765, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,621, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $44,774, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.82%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (46.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 1.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.63%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).