Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,262,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 88.2 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 59.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $50,747, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $85,552, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $41,932, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,538, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,596, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 54.8%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 39.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.9%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 37.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 240.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 121.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 42.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 89.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 107.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 53.6%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.7%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 36.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.2%).