Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Nigerians

Good
Poor
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nigerian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,720,100 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 66.5 Nigerians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Nigerian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $41,026, a difference of 12.6%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $87,730, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $39,641, a difference of 1.8%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,532, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $58,992, a difference of 5.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$41,026
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$97,522
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Poor
$81,725
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$52,039
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Average
$39,641
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$49,416
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$87,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$95,492
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Poor
$58,992
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
23.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.43%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.7%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Average
82.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.34%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
35.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nigerian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileNigerian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Good
2.4%