Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Navajo
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,293,851 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 85.2 Navajo.
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $29,031, a difference of 59.2%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $59,159, a difference of 49.4%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $70,989, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.0%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $33,046, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $42,380, a difference of 23.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 124.1%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 111.5%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 109.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 41.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 46.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 49.0%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 110.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 99.7%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 65.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.89%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 83.3%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 77.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 64.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.83%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Navajo |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.9% |