Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,061,210 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 44.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $53,766, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $89,394, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,163, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $41,685, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,816, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.8%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 3.9%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 34.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.97%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 168.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 68.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 26.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 51.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 35.0%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 32.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.3%).