Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,843,286 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 33.4 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 11.0%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $42,950, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $90,372, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $40,257, a difference of 0.24%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $46,564, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,609, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.5%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%).