Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Yakama

Good
Poor
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,375,681 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.901. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.159% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 159.0 Yakama.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Yakama Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $33,009, a difference of 40.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $76,226, a difference of 27.5%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $83,932, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,321, a difference of 3.6%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $56,234, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
23.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 86.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 69.4%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 28.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
21.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 135.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 89.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
8.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 90.8%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
40.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 113.1%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 64.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
12.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 77.2%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.0%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 46.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileYakama
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.7%