Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,823,164 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $56,975, a difference of 9.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $96,086, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $98,205, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,302, a difference of 0.26%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,945, a difference of 3.6%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 9.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.66%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.21%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%).