Immigrants from Chile vs Osage Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,682,450 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Osage within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.878. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.220% in Osage. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 220.5 Osage.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,388 compared to $75,240, a difference of 17.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $88,390, a difference of 17.0%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,568, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.3%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $50,292, a difference of 11.3%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $42,651, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 36.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 26.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.0%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.3%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Osage communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%).