Immigrants from Chile vs Bermudan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,403,063 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Bermudans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 42.1 Bermudans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 11.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,359, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $88,231, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $39,418, a difference of 2.4%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,593, a difference of 4.6%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $52,465, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 24.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.4%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (85.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bermudan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.86%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 6.7%).