Immigrants from Chile vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,373,825 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 40.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.6%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $110,011, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $106,849, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.62%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.89%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 8.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.77%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.93%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).