Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,047,502 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 108.6 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $97,373, a difference of 6.2%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $53,715, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,697 compared to $47,657, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $51,574, a difference of 1.7%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $102,823, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.14%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.2%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.17%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.51%), 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.36%), disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).