Immigrants from Chile vs French American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,228,510 people shows no correlation between the proportion of French American Indians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in French American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 French American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,388 compared to $76,387, a difference of 15.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $89,811, a difference of 15.1%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $40,244, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $48,977, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $36,920, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.7%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.4% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and French American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 35.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.3%).