Immigrants from Chile vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,910,317 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 7.3 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $84,235, a difference of 15.3%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $40,152, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $90,691, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,391, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $48,691, a difference of 7.7%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $44,118, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 26.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 0.20%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.8%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.34%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.43%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 19.2%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.7%).