Immigrants from Chile vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,412,919 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.074% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 74.2 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.3%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,397, a difference of 5.1%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $44,440, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $55,793, a difference of 0.29%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $61,735, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $102,123, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%), currently married (46.4% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.10%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 62.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).