Immigrants from Chile vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,460,669 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.361% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 361.3 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $82,736, a difference of 25.0%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $85,294, a difference of 23.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $78,911, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,448, a difference of 10.5%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $36,424, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $41,448, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 14.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 37.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.3%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.17%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.8%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.3%).