Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ghanaian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Ghanaians

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ghanaian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,777,974 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.769. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.151% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 150.7 Ghanaians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ghanaian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.1%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $42,164, a difference of 9.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $90,137, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $40,429, a difference of 0.19%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,594, a difference of 0.29%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $46,440, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Poor
$42,164
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Poor
$98,877
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Fair
$83,582
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Average
$46,440
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Poor
$52,810
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Excellent
$40,429
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Good
$52,594
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$90,137
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Poor
$97,277
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Fair
$60,043
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
22.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.9%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Fair
29.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.5%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
35.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
74.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Good
83.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
42.2%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
34.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 49.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
16.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
83.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
48.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
16.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Tragic
5.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.9%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.40%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.41%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
94.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
92.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
87.7%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
84.3%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Poor
63.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Fair
58.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
15.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ghanaian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileGhanaian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Poor
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Fair
47.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Good
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%