Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Hungarians

Good
Good
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,976,376 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.562. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.574% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 574.1 Hungarians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Hungarian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,247, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $57,309, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($105,655 compared to $105,609, a difference of 0.040%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $47,795, a difference of 0.21%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $97,544, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Good
12.2%
Families
Average
8.9%
Good
8.8%
Males
Average
11.1%
Average
11.1%
Females
Average
13.3%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.40%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.57%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Fair
82.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.15%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Good
31.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 10.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Good
6.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileHungarian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Average
2.5%