Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,116,713 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $52,121, a difference of 19.6%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,608, a difference of 16.7%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $95,402, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,621, a difference of 0.35%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $45,812, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $53,503, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 42.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.7%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.84%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 86.2%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 64.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 55.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 74.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%).