Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Chile
Immigrants from Northern Africa
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Africa Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,623,606 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 16.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $42,084, a difference of 4.3%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $49,648, a difference of 4.1%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $58,008, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $62,522, a difference of 0.27%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $46,531, a difference of 0.69%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,185, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,213 | Exceptional $46,531 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,655 | Exceptional $108,161 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,388 | Exceptional $90,026 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,697 | Exceptional $49,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $55,954 | Exceptional $58,008 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,353 | Exceptional $42,084 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,440 | Exceptional $53,185 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,159 | Exceptional $99,232 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,412 | Exceptional $105,430 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,354 | Excellent $62,522 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Good 25.2% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.52%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Excellent 16.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.7% | Good 15.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Good 16.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.3% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Average 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.1% | Good 17.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Average 5.4% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.8% | Poor 35.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Excellent 84.6% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.2% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.7%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.40%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.58%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Fair 46.0% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Average 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Fair 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 31.2% | Exceptional 29.5% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Tragic 12.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.1% | Tragic 87.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
No Schooling Completed | Fair 2.2% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Fair 95.5% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Good 91.4% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Good 89.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.9% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.8% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 61.9% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 41.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.57%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Chile | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.1% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |