Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,362,797 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.150% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 149.8 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $44,735, a difference of 39.4%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $78,249, a difference of 35.0%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $34,910, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $33,291, a difference of 21.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 81.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 53.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.92%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.1%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 32.9%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 78.9%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%).