Immigrants from Chile vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,259,648 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.463. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.351% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 350.7 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $112,666, a difference of 16.0%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $101,681, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $118,426, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.7%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $50,057, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $57,003, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 18.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.44%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.28, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.6% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).