Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Crow
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Crow

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Crow Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,704,117 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.772. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.193% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 192.9 Crow.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Crow Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $31,729, a difference of 45.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $74,257, a difference of 39.3%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $63,681, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,012, a difference of 11.6%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,266, a difference of 14.4%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $38,707, a difference of 23.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$31,729
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$76,605
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$63,681
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$38,707
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$42,434
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$35,266
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$47,012
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$71,337
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$74,257
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$49,234
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
19.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 93.2%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 92.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 88.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 16.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 29.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
20.7%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
19.1%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
33.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
31.0%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
26.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
26.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
32.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
30.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
38.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
15.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 253.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 231.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 227.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
18.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
15.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
17.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
16.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
14.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
60.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
76.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
78.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
78.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 60.2%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 29.4%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 12.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.3%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
41.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.82
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
40.4%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
14.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
40.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Fair
89.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Good
55.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.7%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 57.7%), and bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.51%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
99.7%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
99.7%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
99.6%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
99.6%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
99.6%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
99.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
99.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
99.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
99.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
99.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Poor
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
83.8%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
60.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
27.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 44.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Crow Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileCrow
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
27.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.6%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Fair
17.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Poor
2.5%