Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Celtics

Good
Average
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,084,871 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.736. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 147.6 Celtics.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Celtic Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,388 compared to $83,193, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $43,621, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $60,608, a difference of 2.9%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $54,242, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,447, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Average
$43,621
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Fair
$101,139
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Fair
$83,193
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Fair
$45,732
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Average
$54,242
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$38,283
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$50,447
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Fair
$92,241
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Fair
$98,896
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Average
$60,608
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.64%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.76%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Average
12.3%
Families
Average
8.9%
Good
8.8%
Males
Average
11.1%
Average
11.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Average
13.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Fair
17.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
30.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Good
5.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
41.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.0%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.8%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
26.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Excellent
47.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 15.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
59.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Exceptional
86.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
14.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Celtic Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileCeltic
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Average
47.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%