Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Hawaiians

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,537
SOCIAL INDEX
32.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
218th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hawaiian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,872,297 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.730. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 111.2 Hawaiians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Hawaiian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,403, a difference of 17.3%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $50,488, a difference of 10.8%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $43,673, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,078, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $64,920, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$39,403
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Poor
$98,869
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Average
$84,729
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$43,673
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$50,488
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$37,497
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Excellent
$53,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Poor
$90,722
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Fair
$98,778
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Exceptional
$64,920
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Excellent
24.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 19.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%), female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Fair
12.5%
Families
Average
8.9%
Average
9.0%
Males
Average
11.1%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Average
13.3%
Fair
13.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
18.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Average
17.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Fair
16.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Average
29.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Average
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Average
5.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
81.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.2%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.39%), currently married (46.4% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.7%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.41
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Average
46.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Poor
33.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 47.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 60.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 28.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
92.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
60.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
24.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 52.9%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Poor
85.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
62.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
40.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
31.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Hawaiian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileHawaiian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%