Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ugandan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Ugandans

Good
Average
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ugandan Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,430,221 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.949. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.613% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 613.4 Ugandans.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Ugandan Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,923, a difference of 3.0%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $45,047, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $103,472, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($47,697 compared to $47,854, a difference of 0.33%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $96,667, a difference of 0.51%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Excellent
$45,047
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Excellent
$106,541
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Excellent
$87,557
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Excellent
$47,854
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Good
$55,290
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Exceptional
$40,889
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$50,923
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Good
$96,667
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Excellent
$103,472
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Average
$61,177
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
24.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 13.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.91%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Average
8.9%
Fair
9.3%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Poor
14.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Poor
18.0%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Poor
17.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Poor
17.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Good
28.8%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Poor
11.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Fair
12.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 35.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 6.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.090%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
61.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Average
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
43.8%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
44.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Excellent
30.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Tragic
88.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Tragic
53.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Tragic
17.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.2%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.040%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Average
97.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Average
97.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Good
96.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Excellent
92.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Good
91.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Excellent
89.7%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Good
86.1%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Excellent
66.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
61.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
17.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.33%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Ugandan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileUgandan
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
46.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%