Immigrants from Chile vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,190,584 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $52,074, a difference of 12.7%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $62,857, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $118,440, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $53,739, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $66,891, a difference of 7.3%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $43,308, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.7%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.27%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 11.8%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.80%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.6%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Australian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.16%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.0%).