Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Marshallese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Marshallese

Good
Fair
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,873
SOCIAL INDEX
26.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
240th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Marshallese Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,953,824 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Marshallese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.801% in Marshallese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 800.9 Marshallese.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Marshallese Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $39,108, a difference of 18.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $83,575, a difference of 16.3%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $48,137, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,627, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $65,874, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$39,108
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$95,293
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Tragic
$78,930
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$41,969
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$48,137
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$36,459
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Tragic
$50,627
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Tragic
$83,575
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$90,455
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Exceptional
$65,874
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
23.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
23.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
32.1%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Fair
5.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
39.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
77.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.91%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.38
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
45.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
34.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 54.9%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Fair
54.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
21.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
8.1%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 44.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.2%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.090%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Good
97.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Good
97.1%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Average
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Average
95.7%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Fair
94.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Poor
88.6%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
61.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
55.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
31.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
11.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Marshallese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 37.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Marshallese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileMarshallese
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%