Immigrants from Chile vs Black/African American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,326,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.149% in Blacks/African Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 149.3 Blacks/African Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $73,370, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $78,556, a difference of 31.6%), and median household income ($88,388 compared to $67,573, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,315, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $44,381, a difference of 18.2%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 56.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 10.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 40.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 43.8%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 42.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households (64.6% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Black/African American communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 12.1%).