Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nepalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Nepalese

Good
Poor
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,939
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
281st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nepalese Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,080,213 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Nepalese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.077% in Nepalese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to a decrease of 76.7 Nepalese.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Nepalese Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $38,442, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $49,458, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $54,472, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,603, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $58,761, a difference of 6.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Tragic
$38,442
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Tragic
$94,153
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Poor
$82,410
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Tragic
$43,860
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Tragic
$49,458
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Tragic
$38,603
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$54,472
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Poor
$91,498
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Tragic
$93,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Tragic
$58,761
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Exceptional
22.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.9%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
10.4%
Males
Average
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
15.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Fair
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
15.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
18.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
11.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.6%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 29.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.0%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Tragic
33.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 2.1%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
30.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Poor
45.6%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Tragic
33.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 32.4%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
61.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
24.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
8.7%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 74.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
3.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Tragic
96.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Tragic
95.5%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Tragic
95.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
94.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
93.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
92.8%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
92.0%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
90.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Tragic
89.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
88.1%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Tragic
85.3%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Tragic
81.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Tragic
54.9%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
39.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
29.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Nepalese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 13.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Nepalese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileNepalese
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
0.97%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
28.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
52.6%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%