Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Norwegians

Good
Excellent
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,126,233 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.905. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.269% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 269.2 Norwegians.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 12.6%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $38,802, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($46,213 compared to $44,480, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $55,965, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.26%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $96,866, a difference of 0.30%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.070%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Average
13.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.9%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 70.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 61.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileNorwegian
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%