Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,174,848 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $57,953, a difference of 25.4%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $67,634, a difference of 20.9%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $126,620, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $56,660, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $69,164, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.7%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.29%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.8%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (46.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).