Immigrants from Chile vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 123,273,007 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.889% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 2,888.6 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $37,842, a difference of 22.1%), wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $52,888, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $50,852, a difference of 3.1%), median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $50,878, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($47,697 compared to $42,615, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 28.8%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.42%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 47.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 33.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.35%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.1%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 56.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.0%).