Ecuadorian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,820,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 10.6 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 26.4%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $106,144, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $61,104, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $38,802, a difference of 0.81%), householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $53,127, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($45,214 compared to $46,865, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 75.2%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 66.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 48.9%), and unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 47.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 31.7%), currently married (43.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 253.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 79.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 20.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 49.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 69.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 119.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.0%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.32%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.0%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.4%).