Belgian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 350,104,501 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,113 compared to $53,127, a difference of 6.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,060 compared to $103,682, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($102,788 compared to $106,144, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.61%), median earnings ($46,375 compared to $46,865, a difference of 1.1%), and median male earnings ($55,361 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.6%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and female unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.08, a difference of 0.83%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.9%), college, under 1 year (66.2% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and college, 1 year or more (59.7% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 16.5%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.84%).