French American Indian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,950,120 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.365% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 365.3 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,811 compared to $103,682, a difference of 15.4%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $106,144, a difference of 14.3%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $38,802, a difference of 5.1%), median earnings ($43,333 compared to $46,865, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $53,127, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.4%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.4%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and single male poverty (15.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.7%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 24.8%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 61.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and associate's degree (42.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.74%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 26.5%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 7.1%).