Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Norwegians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,706,622 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.603. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.027% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 27.0 Norwegians.
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $55,965, a difference of 23.2%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $86,084, a difference of 23.2%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $46,865, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,127, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $61,104, a difference of 14.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,660
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$125,956
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$106,057
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$57,114
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$68,960
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$46,324
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,818
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,626
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$124,188
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$70,103
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.3%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 18.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and single female poverty (17.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.4%), male poverty (9.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and poverty (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.3%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 33.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.0%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.5%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 47.9%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 47.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.71%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.73%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.1%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 63.1%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South Central AsiaNorwegian
Disability
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.0%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%