Czech vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechs

Norwegians

Excellent
Excellent
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Czech Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,562,799 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.023% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 23.2 Norwegians.
Czech Integration in Norwegian Communities

Czech vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.3%), median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $55,965, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,164 compared to $86,084, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.17%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.23%).
Czech vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricCzechNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,595
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,839
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Good
$86,164
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Good
$47,221
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,546
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,992
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,421
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,525
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,507
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,244
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.2%
Tragic
29.0%

Czech vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.3%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Czech vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechNorwegian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.0%

Czech vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Czech vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechNorwegian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%

Czech vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.56%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Czech vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Exceptional
84.4%

Czech vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (49.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Czech vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechNorwegian
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.9%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Exceptional
29.3%

Czech vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.8%), no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.47%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Czech vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.3%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
8.0%

Czech vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Czech vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.1%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.2%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.0%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Average
14.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Czech vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
Czech vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricCzechNorwegian
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Good
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%