Turkish vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,724,378 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to a decrease of 41.9 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $44,480, a difference of 17.8%), median household income ($99,389 compared to $86,084, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $38,802, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $53,127, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $61,104, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.27%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.3%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 30.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.7%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.20%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and family households (63.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 81.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 37.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.1%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.6%).