Crow vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,839,750 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.502. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 56.5 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 51.9%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,480, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $103,682, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,802, a difference of 10.0%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,127, a difference of 13.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,865, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 157.3%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 133.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 36.1%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 55.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 293.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 259.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 256.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 46.1%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 37.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 71.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.5%).