Filipino vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,885,079 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.169. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.056% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 55.6 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($115,509 compared to $86,084, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $96,866, a difference of 32.9%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $44,480, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $53,127, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $61,104, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and single female poverty (17.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.5%), family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.2%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 45.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.4%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.92%), married-couple households (51.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 61.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 86.8%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (89.5% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 42.4%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 0.23%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.0%).