Lithuanian vs Norwegian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Norwegian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lithuanians
Norwegians
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Norwegian Integration in Lithuanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 411,083,162 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Norwegians.
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $44,480, a difference of 11.2%), median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $55,965, a difference of 9.4%), and median household income ($93,852 compared to $86,084, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 0.73%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $53,127, a difference of 0.80%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $61,104, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,448 | Good $44,480 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,395 | Excellent $106,144 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,852 | Good $86,084 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,991 | Good $46,865 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,228 | Excellent $55,965 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,108 | Poor $38,802 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,552 | Exceptional $53,127 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,223 | Good $96,866 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,484 | Excellent $103,682 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,209 | Average $61,104 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 29.0% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 10.9%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.17%), poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.66%).
Poverty Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Males | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.7% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 13.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.47%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 46.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.0% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.6% | Exceptional 84.4% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.0%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.56%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.08, a difference of 0.72%).
Family Structure Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
Family Households | Fair 64.0% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.10 | Tragic 3.08 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.0% | Exceptional 50.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.6% | Exceptional 29.3% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 93.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.2% | Exceptional 62.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.4%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Exceptional 1.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 96.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 95.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Exceptional 92.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.9% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.8% | Exceptional 68.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 61.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Excellent 47.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.2% | Average 37.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Average 1.8% |
Lithuanian vs Norwegian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Disability Metric | Lithuanian | Norwegian |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |