Portuguese vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,282,836 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 10.3 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $38,802, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $86,084, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,286 compared to $106,144, a difference of 0.13%), per capita income ($44,362 compared to $44,480, a difference of 0.27%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single female poverty (20.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.1%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.8%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 56.4%), college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.78%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.80%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%).