Brazilian vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Norwegians

Good
Excellent
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,085,462 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Norwegians.
Brazilian Integration in Norwegian Communities

Brazilian vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($46,700 compared to $44,480, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $38,802, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $61,104, a difference of 0.59%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $103,682, a difference of 0.70%), and median family income ($106,942 compared to $106,144, a difference of 0.75%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricBrazilianNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
29.0%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 3.7%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianNorwegian
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
9.0%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.1%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianNorwegian
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 23.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.72%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Exceptional
84.4%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.3%), currently married (46.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.030%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianNorwegian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Exceptional
29.3%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 61.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 48.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.1%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
8.0%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 52.9%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.75%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Average
1.8%

Brazilian vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 0.59%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Brazilian vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianNorwegian
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.3%