Houma vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,027,756 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.276% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 275.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,682, a difference of 43.8%), median family income ($76,188 compared to $106,144, a difference of 39.3%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $86,084, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,965, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,127, a difference of 19.8%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $46,865, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 112.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 98.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (24.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 91.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 26.3%), single mother poverty (43.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 53.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 55.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 96.2%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 60.3%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 58.7%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.08, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 78.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 62.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 48.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 106.7%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 91.9%), and professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 68.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 63.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 11.4%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.7%).