Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ghana
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Norwegian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ghana

Norwegians

Poor
Excellent
1,709
SOCIAL INDEX
14.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
290th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,521
SOCIAL INDEX
82.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
68th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Norwegian Integration in Immigrants from Ghana Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,430,068 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.067% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 67.3 Norwegians.
Immigrants from Ghana Integration in Norwegian Communities

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 29.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $96,866, a difference of 10.4%), and median family income ($96,544 compared to $106,144, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,641 compared to $46,865, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $38,802, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $53,127, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,131
Good
$44,480
Median Family Income
Tragic
$96,544
Excellent
$106,144
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,489
Good
$86,084
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,641
Good
$46,865
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,836
Excellent
$55,965
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,894
Poor
$38,802
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,333
Exceptional
$53,127
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$87,760
Good
$96,866
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,982
Excellent
$103,682
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,624
Average
$61,104
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
29.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.4%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 57.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.91%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and single female poverty (21.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
6.9%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Good
20.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
3.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
14.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.4%
Exceptional
46.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Exceptional
84.4%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.1%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.66%), family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.08
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Poor
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.7%
Exceptional
50.2%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
29.3%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 157.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 47.8%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
93.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
47.4%
Exceptional
62.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 93.2%), college, under 1 year (63.1% compared to 68.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and college, 1 year or more (57.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.7%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
95.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.7%
Exceptional
94.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Exceptional
92.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
68.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.4%
Exceptional
61.7%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.8%
Excellent
47.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.9%
Average
37.5%
Master's Degree
Average
15.0%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Ghana vs Norwegian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from GhanaNorwegian
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Average
12.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
22.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.7%
Exceptional
45.5%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%